I find this definition of heroism radical because it exists in stark contrast to the popular representations of comic book heroism many have grown accustomed to. To be a superhero is to engage in a power fantasy. It is easy to get lost in the action that comes with fantastic power and forget that the motivating purpose of how power is wielded is often much more important than the show of power in itself.
Interestingly, Roxane’s favorite example of loveless power to examine in this instance is the character of Bruce Wayne, more popularly known as Batman. Like most iconic characters, Batman’s existence can be traced through many mediums. Even so, in the most popular images of Batman we see he is a brooding, anguished, tragic figure, vindicated by his trauma. There is often nothing “lovely” about Batman or the world he inhabits. Gay muses, “When you look at the world we live in… Rage is a reasonable response.”
Can we be blamed for being victims to our rage, when our reasons are just? No. But In retrospect, I can’t help but notice the erosion of love from the public perception of what is deemed “good” and what is deemed “evil.” When love is devalued, power fills the void. This results in the societal placement of positive value judgments on powerful figures not based on who they choose to protect with the power of their actions, but on simply the fact that they have it.
Roxane Gay is fascinated by the societal obsession with the joyless Bruce Wayne who cries in his Ferrari. In our stories, is the state of being aggrieved in itself a reasonable justification for fantastic, moral violence? Of course it is. We love a good revenge tale. However, this dedication and possible addiction to vindication has had serious consequences being not only in the literal manifestation of violent acts across the world, but in the way society chooses to interpret tragedy itself.